فقهی حقوقیمقالات

Judicial Viewpoint about Narcotic Crime Contest

 

Abstract

Nowadays the high person of Moslem knows narcotic using as a permissible (mubah) or
undesirable (makruh) thing so that they don’t use it. They believe that narcotic is forbidden
(haram) like wine and they don’t use it at all, due to which narcotic doesn’t acquire all of the
society. The main purpose of this paper is to investigate narcotic crime contest in judicial point
of view. While there are relation hips between drugs forbidden and not to become addicted
and also the judicial point of view has effects in law codification. This article has tried to
investigate judicial quotations and documents about narcotic and have compared Sunnite and
Shiah point of view in this case. This paper has also tried to investigate verses and narratives
about narcotic revere and law codification in this case.

Introduction

As for a report from Interpol, the amount of opium that produced in Afghanistan in 1997 is
about 3800 ton and by means of this report, Afghanistan supports 50% of heroin among the
world and also 80% of heroin among the Europe (Norie, 1999, p. 213; Asadie, 1993, p. 28).
Addicts enhancement, reduction in addict age and epidemic spread of addict even hose wives,
have prepared a bad situation in social, family and personal factors in country while the judicial
point of view has an important effect on reduction of narcotic, that’s why the law derives from
jurisprudence. I have investigated judicial manner in narcotic using reduction that have effects
because of our beliefs (Ali bar, 1998, p. 322).

دانلود فایل پی دی اف

از طريق
Forouzan AlaeinovinKazem Mirzaie Nezhad

نوشته های مشابه

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

دکمه بازگشت به بالا
بستن