Legal and Judicial Politics for Narcotic Smuggling in Islamic Republic of Iran
Abstract
There is a special judgment ethic about narcotic smuggling in Iran’s law. Most of laws that
relate to judgment ethic of narcotic smuggling crimes are different from other crimes judgment
ethics. These differences can be considered in revolution court jurisdiction, special precept in
supply contract, precepts that relate to review wanting, precept that relate to admin manner of
lawyer. Jurisdiction abandon for investigation of narcotics smuggling crimes revolution court as
a special court is due to lawmakers’ attempt to emphasize over the sensitivity of these crimes
and special investigation needed for them. Issuance necessity of temporary arrestment in most
of these crimes is an evidence for legislature rigor in this case. Researchers investigate
investigation manner, jurisdiction and other judgment ethic laws of narcotic smuggling crimes.
Introduction
Mankind has tried to exit from life difficulties. It is necessary for us as a Moslem to know our
religion’s ideology in our societal problems and after that execute it such as narcotics problem.
On the other side, to resolve conflict with narcotics, its production, consumption and free trade
is one of the legal duties of our Folk and Government, and if in case, jurisprudence supports
law, it has more executive support. If law is just due to legislator or court opinion, utmost has a
respect between people and to break it is crime. But if law is adapted with religious
commandments and has had religious and jurisprudence support, conflict with such law is
crime in legal terms and also is taboo w.r.t. religious point of view. So, changing this legal crime
into religious sin can play an important role in preventing people and Islamic society from
committing this crime.
دانلود فایل پی دی اف
